|
|
|
#1 |
|
New Member
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 2
Rep: 10
![]() |
It's time to replace my 2003 Forester with something new. My main requirements are:
(1.) Truly superior all-wheel drive performance. I hike, snowshoe and xc-ski in NH and Vermont mountains so I'm often on steep, poor-quality rutty roads with lots of snow, ice, and mud. My Forester with winter tires does excellent on these. Also see this:Subaru AWD Uphill Comparison Test - YouTube (2) Extremely good safety - both avoidance (brakes, visibility, handling, etc) and crash-test. The 2013 Forester was one of the worst crossover SUV's in NHTSA side-impact and pole-crash tests. (scored a "2" in side-pole) The Forester is strong in front-end collisions but I don't worry as much about those because I'm extremely safety conscious when I drive, but I worry about getting T-boned at an intersection by someone else. (3) Excellent long-term reliability and ease of maintenance. I like to change my own fluids, filters, belts, and lights as much as possible so I want a car that has good access for these things. I'm looking at the Forester, CRV, and RAV4, and might consider other models if they meet my requirements. I'd like to stay under $26K. I usually manage to buy no more than 1% over invoice. Thoughts? Thanks in advance. Last edited by plnelson; 02-20-2013 at 11:55 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Veteran Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Surrey, BC, Canada
Posts: 1,462
Rep: 160
![]() ![]() |
Subaru is known to have the best AWD systems available.
I also searched MSN for safety on Subaru, CRV & RV4. Subaru is again the best, it gets the best rating available. I don't know where you are finding side impact information. Why don't you compare other vehicles with this source? EDIT: Found that only some of the vehicles have this information. You are going to be hard pressed to find an excellent safety rating and excellent AWD. If you have a bigger budget then you could consider a Touareg @ $32,000, gets a 5 star side impact. I know they have a computer assisted AWD similar to Subaru. Of course it only gets 14-20 MPG! I don't like VW, worked at several dealerships and know many dealer techs. I think Subaru is a much better vehicle. Search MSN.com > Autos > new & used car research > Choose a make You can find reliability and safety info there.
__________________
![]() 1999 AWD Jimmy 1995 AWD Jimmy - RIP, 1989 AWD Jimmy - RIP I try to learn from other peoples mistakes that I gave advice to. |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Community Director
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Between a rock and a hard place.
Posts: 6,134
Rep: 129
![]() ![]() |
If you want "truly superior AWD" then go Subaru or go home.
Having driven a newer Rav4, i wouldn't have it on my list.
__________________
Take me down to the paradise city where the grass is green, and the girls are pretty. | Save a tree, support your local drag strip! ![]() Read the rules! | DO NOT REPLY TO SPAM | See a bad post? Just report it!
Daily Driver: 1996 Chevy Blazer LT 4x4 - 235k miles Girlfriend's Car: 2003 Oldsmobile Alero GLS 3.4L 4 door - 130k miles Bike: 1981 Yamaha XS 400 [Almost ready!] Plow Truck: 2000 Chevy Silverado 2500 LT - 190k miles [6.0L, 4x4, ECSB, Eaton Rear Locker] Others: 2012 Chevy Cruze automatic, Sonic sedan manual, both 1.4 Turbo, LT trim |
|
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
New Member
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 2
Rep: 10
![]() |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Tags |
| awd, crv, forester, rav4, safety |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|